Continued Studies - 02/12/2005 (Diversified Currencies Within The Stability Of Another)

PROXIMITY

GESTATION

Continued Notes

From The

Independent Studies

Of

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

Observations

Pertaining To

Social Consistencies

Within The Idea

Of

Proximity Gestation

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

02-12-2005

In continuing with study of Tracy’s Treatise On Political Economy, I find that even before I have reached the fifth page of the first supplement, that many of my beliefs and perspectives are quite supported in comparison with such philosophy and the current results from history until now.

Tracy states in chapter five of the abstract/analytical table that “Insulated man might fabricate but cannot trade. For commerce and society are one and the same thing. It alone animates industry.”

In thinking about that statement, I’ve happened upon many thoughts – many concerning the not so grand state of affairs within the economy of the United States of America in our present day – things I will explore more in depth very soon I do hope.

I have happened upon a thought as well in the direction of something that may allow for more growth and much less ill effect on other things should one area of the economy stagger. That thought is based around a question of why it is we tend to avoid the efficiency of our floating monetary value system. More to the effect of utilizing that tendency while maintaining the current structure as well. The capacities within our country and economy would allow for greater diversity while maintaining that base standard.

For instance, it is possible to purchase a dollars worth of grain – what that really states is that a dollars worth of many other things tallied will get a given amount of grain as per those things included in establishing the floating base value of said “dollar.”

Why shouldn’t it be possible to present another form of currency, a different variety of note in our modern economy? In such a manner as to not only be conducive to the existing forms of currency, but an attribute to the entire system on top of that?

From my current perspective, and in considering the recent success of the European expansion of currency (oddly similar between their "countries" as is our floating dollar between elements of value), it is obviously very possible to establish such a diversity in a very healthy manner. The difference being between that which Europe has managed and what would transpire in the United States differ in almost a direct opposite. In their "expansion" it was in establishing a currency which spanned the different countries and their varieties, where something similar within the United States would be in establishing varieties to span the existing singular monetary element.

I can see where this could be greatly productive in stimulating the economy (if done properly) and even greatly profitable of its own. It seems such would act to contribute to the health of business through allowing a diversity within and between certain areas geographically which would be independent though still a part of the initial designs and dynamic. Simply adding to the possibility of a diversity "within" the larger consistency.

My intention in this direction of thought is not in dismantling the current system of monetary value, but in augmenting it – giving more area and diversity within the economy (which I feel would act to echo through society as well in various ways). Contributing as well through relieving unneeded stress between "classes." This in providing another source and area in and through which to establish a "social" affiliation of sorts – as it greatly played upon anyhow within the media and forms of demographic groupings. This while losing nothing from the existing value system and still maintaining a free flowing society free of extreme segregations.

In thought, it seems as though it might even lend stability to the existing and "mighty" dollar. Even establishing "exchange rates" as per said variations – which of course are independent of one another in similar manners as per the independence from the existing dollar…. While, of course, still being an interacting connection as well with one another and said "dollar."

The more thought I put into it, the more it makes sense, especially in regard to the current tendency in relations between state (regional) and federal levels of government – communities. It seems as though something of the sort would serve to lend efficiency to those relationships as well.

Of course immediate comparisons to the "Confederate Note" are inevitable from the direction of those wanting nothing of the sort in regard to such diversification, but if it were that such were implemented in an efficient way…. I cannot see it as being unsuccessful. Especially in light of the recent success I have mentioned and further in the fact that we as a nation and society, are very much at a level of understanding and advance – to be quite able to implement and perform such augmentations within the existing structure.

We live in an age of advance in so many areas that it seems like a natural progression to institute such augmentation with the understandings of said advance that we never before have had.

We possess such potentials to implement and maintain several given aspects of society in ways further than ever before…but somehow manage to cling to that which we are familiar with.

It definitely seems like the logical step after having implemented quite successfully, the "floating" value system.