Continued Studies - 03/24/2005

PROXIMITY

GESTATION

03-24-2005

Continued Notes

From The

Independent Studies

Of

David A. Archer

02/15/1968

Observations

Pertaining To

Social Consistencies

Within The Idea

Of

Proximity Gestation

(r.f.p.p.s.h.)

03-24-2005

Emulation;

Again I see consistency of emulation – involuntary – of what I have named “Proximity Gestation.”

Not only is it my belief that the physical existence of species in what ever form, is due to the effect of “Proximity Gestation (and interactive connectivity)” – but the developments of societies and the fall of societies is directly related to the emulation of the initial occurrence and re-occurrence of the consistencies (and inconsistencies) of “Proximity Gestation.”

When I examine the progress (and fall) of societies, ideology – human progress (and digression) of any sort, it easily and snugly fits into the concept of “Proximity Gestation.”

The social and metaphysical aspects of existence are just as effected and a part of the workings within that larger process, as are/were the physical.

As a venture, I would say that the social/metaphysical aspects of existence are a type of resonation of the “physical” happening of “Proximity Gestation,” combined with current interactive connectivity – Pertaining yet again, to initial and immediate proximity with/of that “eternal source” – our relationship within it, so to speak.

As immediate example in both physical and metaphysical – I will cite Asian –Eastern countries as a very consistent model of the effects I am referring to in that larger process of “Proximity Gestation.” Note that within the “Asian” version of the human species, there are very distinct – though somewhat subtle differences. Such has been in that manner for a remarkable amount of time.

The Chinese physically appear quite different from the Japanese – and within each culture are some subtle and some even very extreme differences to themselves. More examples can readily be cited throughout Asia in the various differences in cultures and customs as well as physical attributes within different given proximities.

Within the European countries, you will find the same type of consistencies. As with African nations. And such as well with the indigenous peoples of the Americas and Australian continent… and then further are the readily apparent differences (and similarities) between all of these examples of the human species, as well as the facets of “variety” I have explained within each example of themselves. Each group and sub-group then being a bit more responsive to areas “metaphysically” within that larger body of influence – due in my opinion to their given proximity and as well, their “proximity (in the various meanings presented) during “gestation.”